Fair Go Justice is engaging directly with Australian Senators and Members of Parliament to advance four legislative reforms — building a world-leading, evidence-based justice system that serves all Australians, not just those who can afford it.
Australia is the only comparable common-law nation with no independent judicial integrity body. Our Legal Aid system is chronically underfunded. Evidence integrity protocols are non-existent. And AI is now making life-altering decisions in justice contexts — with zero mandatory oversight.
These aren't future risks. They are documented, measurable failures — backed by royal commission findings, court data, and academic research. Fair Go Justice brings these failures to Parliament with a specific, costed, politically viable solution: four targeted Acts that can be introduced in the 2026 legislative year.
Fair Go Justice's four-pillar package is designed to build a broad coalition — not a narrow advocacy niche. Here is how each stakeholder group benefits:
| Stakeholder | Why They Support Reform | Key Message |
|---|---|---|
| Greens — Senator Shoebridge | Progressive values, access to justice, technology ethics leadership | "World-leading ethical AI reform — Australia's first civil society proposal" |
| Attorney-General's Department | National AI Plan alignment, AG Rowland's automated decision-making framework | "Fiscally responsible — AI efficiency funds 1,050 new legal positions" |
| Law Council of Australia | Professional standards, human-in-the-loop mandate creates new work | "1,050+ new lawyer positions — legal profession as beneficiary, not opponent" |
| National Legal Aid | Chronic funding crisis — AI efficiency savings fund service expansion | "50% more clients served, same budget — pilot in QLD/NSW" |
| Technology Sector | Regulatory certainty, Australian-made AI in justice contexts | "Clear accountability rules reduce legal risk — enables industry growth" |
Fair Go Justice proposes a 12-month national pilot of AI-assisted legal aid services, beginning in Queensland and NSW — the two largest Legal Aid jurisdictions by client volume.
Every FGJ proposal is backed by primary sources — not opinion. Key evidence underpinning this engagement:
This is not a complaint. It is a costed, evidence-based, politically viable legislative framework. Four bills. One movement. Ready for Parliament.
✊ Join the Movement Read the Four Pillars →